Eat, pray, give me a break
I’m on page 92 of Elizabeth Gilbert’s smash, run-around-the-world-for-a-year hit memoir, Eat Pray Love.
A friend of mine laughed when she heard I was reading it.
“You won’t be able to get through it,” she said.
I resisted reading it because I never read the best-sellers when they’re best-selling. I never believe the hype and I never-ever want to be caught in a coffee klatch where everyone is reading the same book and referring to “that Elizabeth Gilbert,” while they’re slapping their knee or laughing over Gilbert’s early morning forays with gelato as we sip our Columbian light roast in a suburban coffee shop that has broken toys on the floor and a chalk board on the wall, and where the only call to see the light is when someone’s kid can’t reach the switch in the bathroom.
But I’ll admit Gilbert’s book is making me laugh. I actually called my daughter over and had her sit with me while I read her a page and a half about pizza. Now she wants pizza for dinner and I can’t say I blame her. Gilberts humor is delightful and her writing is rich and evocative. I mean, I could smell the damn pizza. My mouth was watering while I was reading it. She is having a good time and we’re with her in Italy, so much so that I’m reading — or trying to read — the Italian words in her book aloud so that I can share in her delight of the language.
But I’ve got to be honest, I don’t like her very much. And I won’t say it’s nothing personal. It’s completely personal.
I don’t envy her travels. I have no travel-bug. I don’t begrudge her success in writing a best-seller. I don’t begrudge anyone anything. If I did, frankly, I’d spend every day just going through list upon list of things I want that other people have. It’s not worth it and begrudging usually means not only do you want it, but you’re pissed as hell that someone else has it.
I do think she is completely self-indulgent. And while that’s her prerogative and no one is holding a gun to my head forcing me to read this book, I see her, so far, as selfish and untrustworthy. And who likes someone like that?
I wonder about the people, women I imagine, who have built emotional shrines in Gilbert’s honor. If I’d have cried on the floor of the bathroom night after night before getting divorced, I would not have ended up with a trip to Italy, I’d have ended up with sore knees and bags under my eyes and someone banging on the door needing to get in to pee. Elizabeth Gilbert had God speak to her. I’d have had kids yelling at me through the crack under the door. Gilbert found herself. I’d have gone to find the waffles in the depths of the freezer.
I wonder what Gilbert would have done if someone else needed her for something while her life was falling apart. How many family members and friends did she fail? If no one counted on her to begin with, that says a lot about someone.
I don’t see her as the heroine in her book, so far I see her as the villain. Someone who takes what she wants and leaves it when she’s done, with everyone else to clean up the mess.
All the pieces fell into place for Gilbert — at least they have up to page 92 — and for that she is very lucky. But I was looking for special, not lucky. Anyone can heal themselves if they’re so inclined, especially if they are also inclined with enough money to live on and no responsibilities other than to document your own life and living it the way you choose.
I guess I’m disappointed. Not in the writing or the story-telling — and these days that’s mostly why I read — for the how’s as opposed to the what’s.
But if Gilbert would have carried a backpack full of bricks with her through her travels, that she could never put down, how would she have fared? Would she have delighted in her anonimity in Italy if it was laden with counting pennies (or whatever Italians count) as she paid for each gelato? If her international posse would have shunned her for not being Italian, would she have always reveled in being alone?
Triumph, I was expecting triumph. Yoo hoo, anybody seen Triumph? Nope didn’t think so. But there’s no hardship here, which is what you need in order to triumph. She got divorced. YAWN. It was a bad divorce. Double yawn. She makes no bones about the fact that her next relationship overlapped the end of her marriage. She was never alone. Yes, she was depressed, yes she had setbacks.
None of this makes her unique.
The fact that she can write about it so eloquently, and with such candor (candor in the sense of not masking the fact that she is fortunate) is what makes her unique.
I like the women I read about to be brave and strong, to overcome adversity even if it’s adversity at their own hand. I like to read about real life situations and many of the best of those, come to fruition, in fiction.
I do know, and respect, that Gilbert isn’t giving us every sordid detail. So I’m making assumptions – which isn’t always nice – but is certainly my prerogative based on what I’ve read so far.
All I can say is that if someone wanted to take care of everything in my life for a year, pay me well, and pack my bags, I wouldn’t go. I would fight my demons where they found me. Hell, I have.
Plus, my personal guru is Dorothy Gale.
“If I ever go looking for my heart’s desire, I won’t look any further than my own backyard, because if it isn’t there, I never really lost it to begin with.”




I am so out of it–I don’t know who Elizabeth Gilbert is. I have no desire to read her, however, I am waiting for someone else to get their book written. That book, I will read.
Hi Amy:
Interesting take . . . I, too, found her hopelessly self-indulgent, even though I enjoyed the book. I thought, time and again, “Honeybun, you want a dark night of the soul, try living with Crohn’s disease and having dootors call your parents to leave on a plane immediately to say good-bye because you are not expected to make it through the night. Have your ex-husband threaten to subpoena your medical records so he can get custody, even while not living up to his visitation. Try planning your own funeral . . . then go on to have three more kids against overwhelming odds. Then give me a call. ” LOL!
I mentioned on another blog I had a similar reaction to Buddha or Bust. It, too, had great acclaim, was written up all over the place. I WANTED to like it–he was a Buddhist after all. But even in his enlightenment, he was a whiner. A self-pitying whiner in compulsively bad relationships. A commitment-phobe. I just couldn’t get through it and skimmed to the end.
E
Now, see, I LOVED Eat, Pray, Love. It does get better, and you do find out that she has a depression/anxiety disorder. It’s a little strong to watch, though, I agree.
Not all of are lucky enough to have family to count on us. It definitely makes getting through the hard times easier, because you HAVE to go on. I know it may appear it should be the opposite, but it’s not. When it’s just you, it’s a thousand times more difficult.
India is by far my favorite part. I’ll be interested to see what you think of it!
I have not read the book yet. I am not certain if I will.
But wow I found your distaste for this woman strong. Everyone has a different experience and travels a different path in life. I was especially disturbed by your quote that if no one depends on you it says something about your character… YES, it says that you are strong and independent, courageous and adventurous, a free spirit, a seeker, etc. Perhaps someone in that situation was shunned by their family for being different and has made a life of moving often in order to avoid being hurt?
I am curious to explore your blog further…
I disagree with Seeking Destiny. The tenet of nearly every religion and philosophy since the dawn of time has been built on the idea of compassion, doing unto others, and caring for one’s fellow man–it’s not a Christian or Jewish tenet solely–but a tenet of Buddhists, of Baha’i, of Unitarians, of so many . . . if you seek truth, look only into the face of a child dying of AIDS in Africa. The truth anyone seeks is found in the care we give to the children and the elderly on the planet, in our neighborhoods, in war zones and places of famine. If no one in your entire world counts on you, while I wouldn’t necessarily look it as a character flaw, I think the idea of “free spirit” can be idealized as well. Moving on. Not putting down roots. There’s certainly a lore and love of adventurers. But the reality is I think a life of real meaning is built precisely on caring for one’s fellow man. For some, that is children. A spouse. A partner. For others it’s a calling to work at the food bank. To drive a Meals on Wheels van. To reach out to the neighbor who can’t afford to heat her house this year, and she’s 80 and on a fixed income. To go into the ghettos and help educate, or to go to Africa and provide mosquito netting against malaria. If NO PERSON is impacted by your existence, then did you even exist? Obviously, that’s rhetorical. But I at least see Amy’s point.
E
I actually just had a conversation with a friend about that book. She is a widow with a special needs adult-child and a teenager (and we know how exasperating THOSE can be). She owns her own business and works just about 7 days a week, usually more than 10 hours per day.
She had a hard time with the book as well, and luckily we’ve both come far enough to just reminisce about the trips we’ve taken together with our kids — and how considering the circumstances — those were the perfect trips for us. Our own nirvana at the time, I guess.
To each her own, that’s for sure.
I came to your blog via the comments you left on Ask Allison. And I’m glad I did. I really enjoy your thought provoking, honest assessment. This book was so lauded on Oprah and in reviews, Ms. Gilbert was nearly held out as a guru herself. When I read the book I enjoyed it, but had a similar reaction to yours. I’m happy she had the opportunity to go on this journey of find herself, but much of the time she seemed self-indulgent in her assessment of herself, her ‘luck’ and those around her.
I look forward to reading more of your posts!
-suzanne